Harry Potter and the Secondary Character Theory
Okay, the first of probably many entries inspired by participation at TWH.
I love theories and meta. I do. The last thing I want to do is have fewer theories in the world. If you can find a way that Blaise Zabini is really Norbert the Norwegian Ridgeback, and his true love for Nagini will create an essential opening for Harry, I'll be very impressed, not to mention amused. I won't think it's likely to pan out in canon, but there are some damned clever theories out there, and they make fandom really, really fun, imho.
The reason I'm thinking about the issue, though, is something that came up in secondary (and even minor) character panels. I went to panels on Neville and Luna, and I modded one on Tonks. All three involved theories about how that character was going to play an extremely key role in the final battle. It's said about other characters, too, I believe. As fun meta to play with and write fanfic with, what the heck? But for Canon Divination... I think it may lead to some disappointment.
( Collapse )
I love theories and meta. I do. The last thing I want to do is have fewer theories in the world. If you can find a way that Blaise Zabini is really Norbert the Norwegian Ridgeback, and his true love for Nagini will create an essential opening for Harry, I'll be very impressed, not to mention amused. I won't think it's likely to pan out in canon, but there are some damned clever theories out there, and they make fandom really, really fun, imho.
The reason I'm thinking about the issue, though, is something that came up in secondary (and even minor) character panels. I went to panels on Neville and Luna, and I modded one on Tonks. All three involved theories about how that character was going to play an extremely key role in the final battle. It's said about other characters, too, I believe. As fun meta to play with and write fanfic with, what the heck? But for Canon Divination... I think it may lead to some disappointment.
( Collapse )